yet another exposure of twisting of data to make a propaganda seem real. i see around me, many who have happily lapped up the imposed guilt of global warming climate change and continue to change the way they live, without ever questioning the basis of it all. only the loud noises get heard in today’s world. the soft voice of sanity is easily subdued.
[…] Dr. Gray’s experience revealed that, “Penetrating questions often ended without any answer. Comments on the IPCC drafts were rejected without explanation, and attempts to pursue the matter were frustrated indefinitely.”
“I have been forced to the conclusion that, for significant parts of the work of the IPCC, the data collection and scientific methods employed are unsound…normal scientific procedures are not only rejected by the IPCC, but that this practice is endemic, and was part of the organization from the very beginning.”
“I therefore consider that the IPCC is fundamentally corrupt.”
Dr. Gray concluded that the only reform “I could envisage, would be its abolition.”
[…]
Undaunted, Dr. Gray continued, “The two main ‘scientific’ claims of the IPCC are the claim that ‘the globe is warming’ and ‘increases in carbon dioxide emissions are responsible.’ Evidence for both of this claims is fatally flawed.”
High Cost of Climate Lies by Alan Caruba — Capitalism Magazine
Full Text of Dr. Grey’s Letter: in which he talks of even how the term global warming has evolved, since the inconvenient truth is, that this year will see cooling.
And, then after all, there has been no “global warming”, however measured, for eight years, and this year is all set to be cooling. As a result it is now politically incorrect to speak of “global warming”. The buzzword is “Climate Change” which is still blamed on the non-existent “warming”
funny, most people dedicated to the cause of climate change are still fighting the war against global warming.
the small issue 
Question really should be whether we all agree there is a change in our environment and if so what will be the repercussions of that. Are we really a civilisation who are more concerned of how right or wrong we are or one that cares of what happens to this earth after we have gone. Political or other wise.
LikeLike
@EU: i’d say that, that has (unfortunately) become a different discussion altogether. it probably isn’t very difficult to imagine and know that the place we live in should be cared for. in fact it doesn’t need any statistical proof.
what is being done in the name of climate change, is fairly murky, but.
LikeLike
Well even common sense tells you they are lying ,without c02 everything and everyone would die that is a fact,is methane more dangerous than c02 in the atmosphere ? sure is a 1000 times worse it turns into sulphuric acid in the upper atmoshere and does not help provide the oxegen we need ,the earths c02 is about 0.03 methane is 5per cent ,well the biggest producer of methane? animals, and forests with decomposition of the undergrowth,go figure that one ,if we plant more trees we will need more c02,now the greens cant choose methane as the culprit seeing as the forests they save are a main producer ,the world was once so hot we couldnt live here ,its not now ,climate models are based on the navier stokes equasion but that has never been solved mathematicly so its a varient model and are based on 100 years to 1000 yrs,well f..k me im not paying for 50yrs for a dream , no one can tell what will happen in 1 oo yrs we will all be dead then anyway !its a con!
LikeLike
==Terry:
I hear you! 🙂
LikeLike